William E Hartnett

age ~65

from Salt Lake City, UT

Get Report

Also known as:

Connected to:

William Hartnett Phones & Addresses

w***[email protected]

Systems: Approaches, Theories, Applications Including The Proceedings Of The Eighth George Hudson Symposium Held At Plattsburgh, New York, April 11-12, 1975
view source
Author:

William E. Hartnett
ISBN #:

9027708223

Shares For All: Options For Distributing Wealth Through Privatisation
view source
Author:

William J. Hartnett
ISBN #:

1919708251

Privatization Marketplace
view source
US Patent:

61121886, Aug 29, 2000
Filed:

Nov 20, 1995
Appl. No.:

8/436219
Inventors:

William J. Hartnett - Pasadena CA
International Classification:

G06F 1760
US Classification:

705 35
Abstract:

Computerized methods and tools for developing and implementing economic policies are provided. The methods and tools, which do not rely on advanced communications of financial market trading infrastructure, include the principal steps of preparing a privatization business plan (101) that includes an cost of the assets and a plan for distributing the assets. The review of the privatization plan by a Privatization Board (103). Executing the plan (105). Restructuring the enterprise in accordance to the plan (107). Submitting an application for certification of demonopolization to the Privatization Board (109). Receiving an effective demonopolization date from the Privatization Board (111).

Adaptive Knowledge Base
view source
US Patent:

60649712, May 16, 2000
Filed:

Jun 7, 1995
Appl. No.:

8/476483
Inventors:

William J. Hartnett - Pasadena CA
International Classification:

G06F 1516
G06F 1730
US Classification:

705 7
Abstract:

A method to operate a computerized adaptive knowledge base. The contents and organization of the adaptive knowledge base evolve based on the contributions and evaluations of a user community. Whether a particular set of contents or an alternative organization is preserved for future iterations is a function of user evaluations, taking into account the amounts of information and the relative importance of content vis-a-vis organization. Items of the adaptive knowledge base which are as yet unevaluated by a particular user are ranked by estimating that user's evaluations, based on other items for which evaluations are available to compare with other users. For example, evaluations are estimated from regressions with other users, weighted by functions of the correlation coefficients, the number of observations in common, and the significance of those observations for the particular user in the sense that their evaluation differs from the mean evaluation.