Rinku Kanwar

US Patent:

20030204751, Oct 30, 2003

Filed:

Apr 24, 2003

Appl. No.:

10/249623

Inventors:

Rahul Jindani - South Burlington VT, US
Vinod Kannoth - Glen Allen VA, US
Deepak Kanwar - South Burlington VT, US
Rinku Kanwar - Saint Paul MN, US
Jay Krishnamurthy - Framingham MA, US
Gregory McKee - Concord NC, US
Sandeep Mehta - Colchester VT, US
Penny Peachey-Kountz - South Burlington VT, US
Ravi Ravipati - Colchester VT, US

Assignee:

International Business Machines Corporation - Armonk NY

International Classification:

G06F015/16
H04L009/32

US Classification:

713/201000, 709/226000, 709/229000

Abstract:

A computer implemented web based access control facility for a distributed environment, which allows users to request for access, take the request through appropriate approval work flow and finally make it available to the users and applications. This program also performs an automatic task of verifying the health of data, access control data as well as the entitlements, to avoid malicious user access. The system also provides an active interface to setup a backup, to delegate the duty in absence. Thus this system provides a comprehensive facility to grant, re-certify and control the entitlements and users in a distributed environment.

US Patent:

20220413847, Dec 29, 2022

Filed:

Jun 25, 2021

Appl. No.:

17/358166

Inventors:

- Armonk NY, US
Abdulhamid Adebowale Adebayo - White Plains NY, US
Sai ZENG - Yorktown Heights NY, US
RINKU KANWAR - PARKLAND FL, US

International Classification:

G06F 8/73
G06F 8/10
G06F 8/30

Abstract:

A content generation method includes receiving a control document comprising one or more control clauses, identifying actionable content for the one or more control clauses, generating a programming language template for the one or more control clauses, identifying a closest existing control clause from a database for each of the one or more control clause, identifying a programming language implementation of the closest existing control clause, identifying similarities and differences between the programming language implementation and the generated programming language template, and annotating the programming language implementation for the closest existing control clause based on the identified similarities and differences. The method may additionally include determining whether a closest existing control clause exists, providing the generated programming language template to a user responsive to determining that a closest existing control clause does not exist, and receiving feedback from the user regarding the generated programming language template.