Barry Allan Fisher - Maple Grove MN, US Jack Leon Hendrickson - Carver MN, US Neal Joseph Gieselman - Eagan MN, US Anthony Ray Misslin - Chanhassen MN, US Michael Raymond Guzik - Fridley MN, US Curtis Lee Kruse - Eagan MN, US William Richard Cayo - Prior Lake MN, US David Eugene Stoltzmann - Bayport MN, US John J. Jancsek - Blaine MN, US
Assignee:
Identix Incorporated - Bloomington MN
International Classification:
G06K 9/00
US Classification:
382115, 382116, 382117, 382118
Abstract:
A portable device for the live scanning of fingerprint, facial and crime scene images and the wireless transmission of said images to a central host system for identity verification. The portable device has the ability to allow the user to operate the device with a single hand. It can scan and record live fingerprint slap or roll images (via optical, solid state, or video sensors). It also includes a baffle that assists with the mechanical alignment of the fingerprints on the fingerprint sensor receiving surface and prevents bright light sources from interfering with fingerprint scans. The portable device also can scan, display, and record latent fingerprint images. It also has other data receiving and transmission functions, such as displaying and recording facial and incident scene images in conditions ranging from well lit to total darkness, recording and playing back incident scene audio information for incident description and contacting voice recordings for identification. The portable apparatus can also scan, record, and interpret magnetic stripe, smart card, or bar code information from standard and non-standard cards. It also obtains, displays, and records geographical position for incident description, mapping, and directional instruction to the user.
- Petaluma CA, US Mark R. Biegert - Maple Grove MN, US Charles J. Eddleston - Minneapolis MN, US Gregg C. Heikkinnen - Rogers MN, US Curtis L. Kruse - Eagan MN, US
Techniques are described for identifying a rogue network interface device whose laser is not under control of a controller of the network interface device. The techniques identify the rogue network interface device based on reception of a predefined data pattern in a timeslot that is not reserved for any of the network interface devices without needing to disable upstream data transmission from the network interface devices during their assigned timeslots. The techniques also relate to a network interface device determining whether the network interface device is transmitting optical signals at a wavelength different than the wavelength that the OLT to which the network interface device is associated receives.
- Petaluma CA, US Mark R. Biegert - Maple Grove MN, US Charles J. Eddleston - Minneapolis MN, US Gregg C. Heikkinnen - Rogers MN, US Curtis L. Kruse - Eagan MN, US
Techniques are described for identifying a rogue network interface device whose laser is not under control of a controller of the network interface device. The techniques identify the rogue network interface device based on reception of a predefined data pattern in a timeslot that is not reserved for any of the network interface devices without needing to disable upstream data transmission from the network interface devices during their assigned timeslots. The techniques also relate to a network interface device determining whether the network interface device is transmitting optical signals at a wavelength different than the wavelength that the OLT to which the network interface device is associated receives.